Ford Focus Safety

"The Mk 1 Ford Focus received 4 out of 5 stars for occupant safety, and 2 out of 4 stars for pedestrian safety in its EuroNCAP tests (69% frontal, 83% side, 28% pedestrian).[4] In Australia, the 2002–2005 Ford Focus was assessed in the Used Car Safety Ratings 2006 as providing "average" protection for its occupants in the event of a crash."
(source:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Focus_%28International%29)



__________________________
Autopartswarehouse.com rocks!  

My Cutlass has no crumple zones, no airbags, no stability control, an OPTIONAL shoulder belt...and I drove the thing every day for two years (March to November).  Safety ratings are the least of my concern when discussing cars...especially a cut and paste job from wikipedia...

What this thread has to do with Car Craft or its general populace...I have no idea.  
68 Olds Cutlass ~ 350 Rocket
85 Delta 88 ~ 425 Rocket
02 Silverado 4X4 ~ 5.3L

Heck, one of my cars doesn't even have a roof  I think all 11 of that guy's posts have been wiki quotes.  
-
The Silver Buick- '77 Skylark coupe w/455&TKO-600, '72 Centurion Conv't - 455w/TH400, '67 T-bird 4Dr (suicide) w/428&C6. Needing to replace a '69 Firebird 400.

http://www.bangshift.com/forum/index.php?topic=6189.0

TheSilverBuick:
Heck, one of my cars doesn't even have a roof  I think all 11 of that guy's posts have been wiki quotes.

Wow...no roof eh?  

But yeah I'm a bit confused...wiki isn't exactly a pay site...so can we consider this spam??  Certainly has nothing to do with the topics generally discussed here...but there is no profit for getting people to look at wikipedia...  
68 Olds Cutlass ~ 350 Rocket
85 Delta 88 ~ 425 Rocket
02 Silverado 4X4 ~ 5.3L

The issue i see with this guy is the fact that he has a link to his site in his sig. Thats spam enough for me to ban.