Car Craft Magazine Homepage
Share This Share This Num Posts    Sort Order
1 |  2 |  >> 
NEW CAMARO--Lutz sez it's still not a GO  
MrFoMoCo MrFoMoCo
User | Posts: 241 | Joined: 03/05
Posted: 05/15/06
07:46 AM

Don't slash your wrists yet, Camaro fans. But Robert Lutz told Automotive News in the current edition that the General still hasn't made a decision on whether to build the 201x Camaro . . . .


"DETROIT -- Product chief Robert Lutz thinks General Motors can sell more than 100,000 units of the Chevrolet Camaro . . . ." 


"Is it an approved program? No."


GM might . . . MIGHT . . .  come to a decision in about six months or so on whether to build the "someday" Bow-Tie pony car.  But even if they do, GM's OZ division--Holden-- won't even have the basic platform ready for the U.S. market until about 2009.  So you'll have plenty of time to save up for it . . . .


Meanwhile, Ford will have sold hundreds of thousands of ready-to-rod Mustangs by the time the first "dream" Camaro could hit the streets.


Of course, by then, "President Hillary and the car-hating Democrats" will probably have the CAFE standard increased to about 40 m.p.g. . . . so what would be the point in buying a "new Camaro?"  (maybe they could still slide a few by with the GDI Ecotec four-popper out of the turbo Solstice).


Talk about missed opportunities (heh, heh, heh)







Edited 5/15/2006 8:12 am by MrFoMoCo (MrFoMoCo1)  

 
71_bigblocknova 71_bigblocknova
Guru | Posts: 930 | Joined: 09/04
Posted: 05/15/06
10:11 AM

hey, keep laughing, while GM is getting back in the game, ford is losing tons of money and going down. So maybe by the time the camaro does come out, ford wont be around...haha. good thing to, I think people are about sick of every wanna be racer coming up to the stop light in his v-6 mustang thinking their hot ####.  


 
MrFoMoCo MrFoMoCo
User | Posts: 241 | Joined: 03/05
Posted: 05/15/06
11:24 AM

It won't be so funny for the Bow-Tie brigade when 20,000 500-factory-h.p. GT500s are at the stop lights of America over the next couple of years, will it?


Richard Holdener pulled 990 h.p. out of a stock-block, stock-head '03 Cobra engine.   Just imagine what the turbo tuners and the nitrous squeezers will be able to extract from the far-superior 5.4 GT500 'plant!  And if Bush's push for more E85 "gasoline" brings cheap, racing-quality alky to nearly every corner store . . . look out! 

 

 
71_bigblocknova 71_bigblocknova
Guru | Posts: 930 | Joined: 09/04
Posted: 05/15/06
11:43 AM

actually, what is funny is ford thinking the GT is a bad ass car when the Z06 gives the same performance for half the cost. then when the (possible) blue devil edition comes out, it will walk over the GT and still cost alot less. As for the GT500's not really worried, I'll have fun making my cars just a fast for less money. 50k, yes its decently priced. Is it a ZO6 killer, no. but its working on it.

 

 
MrFoMoCo MrFoMoCo
User | Posts: 241 | Joined: 03/05
Posted: 05/15/06
12:27 PM

A GT500 with $8,000-$10,000 in aftermarket parts will roast Z06s in the quarter for substantially less than just the stock Z06, sans modification. 


Furthermore, the Z06 isn't really a very good candidate for serious forced induction because of its stratospheric compression ratio and weak-sister hypereutectic pistions.  So after a Z06 owner takes a few hits to his platnum card in unsuccessful bouts with a few "tuned" GT500s (most Z06 drivers would never carry cash . . . too gauche), he will need to spend almost twice as much to achieve the same power as just about any ordinary mope with hand tools will routinely get out of a "tuned" GT500 on the stock shortblock and heads.


Comparing a mass-produced Z06 to a hand-built Ford GT makes about as much sense as comparing a Cadillac Cimmaron to a BMW 325i.  Both had about the same level of performance, but there was no real contest on style, quality, execution, and resale values.

 

 
71_bigblocknova 71_bigblocknova
Guru | Posts: 930 | Joined: 09/04
Posted: 05/15/06
01:03 PM

the Z06 isnt just mass produced, tho it is an affordable supercar. come on, the engines are hand built by one man. we'll see what can be done to make it faster if the blue devil performance comes out. oh and the GT500 is only 475 h.p. could be more or less in real life, maybe they should have it officially dyno'd. if people were really smart, they would get the C6 and add the procharger kit. 600+ h.p and would probably cost as much as the GT500 when all is said and done. so dont worry, there is a corvette that can be tuned.  


 
MrFoMoCo MrFoMoCo
User | Posts: 241 | Joined: 03/05
Posted: 05/15/06
02:53 PM

Forget 475.   The SAE has certified the GT500 at 500 emissions-legal Clydesdales!


"Final certification testing of the Shelby GT500's 5.4-liter supercharged V-8 shows it will produce 500 horsepower and 480 lb.-ft. of torque - 25 more horsepower than preliminary estimates.


'With 500 hp and the Shelby name, this car is an instant legend,' said Hau Thai-Tang, director, Advanced Product Creation & SVT programs.


http://media.ford.com/newsroom/feature_display.cfm?release=23017


The Procharger is a good unit, but there's no way it can produce the sort of low-end and midrange torque that a good Eaton or a properly-sized turbo can when all of these power adders are operated at streetable boost levels on a small-block V8 (Centrifugal superchargers produce very little "bottom end" because of slow impeller speeds). 


Furthermore, a Procharged C6 is going to be very boost-limited on pump unleaded because of its high compression ratio and weak factory pistons.


600 h.p. from the GT500 will be child's play . . . a short afternoon of bolt-ons and an ECU flash.  Nothing at all like trying to shoehorn in a huge centrifugal supercharger into a cramped plastic two-seater.


BTW, when did they start making a Corvette with a back seat?  Score another one for the Shelby . . . .

 

 
71_bigblocknova 71_bigblocknova
Guru | Posts: 930 | Joined: 09/04
Posted: 05/15/06
09:13 PM

Well, with about 330 rw ft lbs of torque at 3000 rpm to about 450 ft lbs at about 4800 enough torque. I don't know what the pistons are made out of, but even with its limited boost capability, its larger displacement should make for about an even amount of power with more boost on the smaller ford motor. and if all else fails, theres always nitrous.


Sure the corvette doesnt have a back seat, never sat in a new stang, but the last model mustangs were too comfortable in the back seat anyways. 


Clydesdales huh? sounds like a budwiser man to me and I give you props for that.





Edited 5/15/2006 9:16 pm by 71_bigblocknova (71_bigblockn)  

 
MrFoMoCo MrFoMoCo
User | Posts: 241 | Joined: 03/05
Posted: 05/16/06
07:14 AM

Certainly extra cubic inches and higher compression will make up some of the ground.


However a 2V 6.0 LS2 doesn't have enough size advantage over a 4V 5.4 to overcome the 6.0s dynamic compression ratio limitation on pump gasoline.  Off the showroom floor, the 5.4 will virtually match the mass air flow (and thus power) of the expensive 7.0 LS7 and will be 100 h.p. stronger than the pedestrian 6.0.  Yet the Eaton will only need to pump out about 8 psi (46.65 hg absolute manifold pressure; estimated density ratio of around 1.45:1) to achieve this power level.   


The high compression ratio of the stock LS2 6.0 (not to mention its weak hypereutectic pistons) prevent reliable "boost" over 8 psi because the peak cylinder pressures exceed the detonation threshold of pump gasoline.  (In fact, Procharger's LS2 Corvette kit limits boost to 6.2 psi, intercooled) 


Of course,  the LS2 gains about 3% extra power per point of additional compression over the supercharged 4V 5.4, but these mechanical efficiency gains pale in comparison to the huge increases in density (i.e. more boost) the stock low-compression 5.4 will tolerate on pump gasoline.    A stock 5.4 running 14 lbs boost (in the neighborhood of 1.8:1 density ratio, depending on the power adder's efficiency) will flow a ton more air than a stock 6.0 LS2 at boosted to only 6 psi.


 Procharger's somewhat optimistic chart suggests that an engine with the same compression as the GT500's on pump fuel could live with up to 24 psi (this high boost spike on pump gasoline is undoubtedly a function of the centrifugal supercharger's inherently mild density ratios at low and medium engine speeds and the tendency of most street cylinder heads and cams to restrict airflow past the midrange, creating extra "boost" from excess air stacking up in the ports without significant corresponding increases in cylinder pressure).


Furthermore, depending on the power adder selected, a high-boost 5.4 could have as much as a 200 lbs/ft torque advantage in the crucial midrange rpm sector over a low-boost, stock block LS2.


Obviously, the deep-pocketed LS2/LS6/LS7 builders will be able rebuild (or wholly build) engines with aftermarket parts that will withstand enormous cylinder pressures on racing gas or alcohol. But using strictly exterior bolt-on power adders and pump gasoline, the stock GT500 has vastly more power potential than a stock LS2/LS6/LS7. 

 

 
71_bigblocknova 71_bigblocknova
Guru | Posts: 930 | Joined: 09/04
Posted: 05/16/06
12:31 PM

so in stock form the 5.4 can beat the 6.0 with more boost, but what about when it comes nitrous?  


 
Sixt9coug Sixt9coug
User | Posts: 170 | Joined: 02/05
Posted: 05/16/06
08:30 PM

ok. squeeze the blown 5.4L then .  


 
71_bigblocknova 71_bigblocknova
Guru | Posts: 930 | Joined: 09/04
Posted: 05/16/06
11:56 PM

ha. well in all reality, under hi boost and a decent squeeze, do you think it would hold for more than a pass or two?  


 
CSIROC
Enthusiast | Posts: 698 | Joined: 11/05
Posted: 05/17/06
05:45 PM

Ford boys just wishin they had a real race car...

I must agree though...the camaro is going to be dead before it even comes out again...Ford is reaping the benifits of the current market...GM is going to completely miss out.  Gas prices will only rise and the market for a retro muscle car will eventually die out.  GM doesn't understand that the market wants the car now...not in 3-4 years

I'm a fan of the Vette and the CTS-V...other than that...GM blows...I'll stick to my older models...at least they have character





Edited 5/17/2006 5:51 pm by CSIROC  
68 Olds Cutlass ~ 350 Rocket
85 Delta 88 ~ 425 Rocket
02 Silverado 4X4 ~ 5.3L

 
MrFoMoCo MrFoMoCo
User | Posts: 241 | Joined: 03/05
Posted: 05/18/06
07:03 AM










"Ford boys just wishin they had a real race car..."


You've got to be kidding.  Most of us "Ford Boys" will be heading out to St. Louis today or tomorrow, where hundreds of "real race cars" sporting Blue Oval power will go heads up. 


Why not drop by?


BTW, if it wasn't for the 1955 Thunderbird, the Corvette would have died in 1954. 


If it wasn't for the venerable flathead V8 firmly establishing V8 power as the standard in the low-priced class, Chevrolet likely wouldn't have ever built another V8 after 1919. 


 If it wasn't for Ford-trained William S. Knudsen guiding the vast and rapid expansion of Chevrolet in the 1920s, most Car Crafters might never have heard of the infamous "Bow Tie" brand.  


If it wasn't for the 1964 Mustang, Chevy Crafters would never have seen the first Camaro (and probably would be focused on hopping up their Corvairs and Chevy IIs today). 


 If it wasn't for Chevrolet's desire to beat Ford in stock car racing, the 1963 "Mystery Motor" would never have been developed and thus, the BBC would have been variations on the W-block 348/409 instead. 


If Chevrolet hadn't wanted to beat Ford in SCCA Trans-Am competition, there would have been no Z/28s.


If it wasn't for Chevrolet wanting to beat Ford's 1962 Fairlane, there probably never would have been a 1964 Chevelle.


If it wasn't for John Delorean wanting to beat Ford's "personal luxury" Thunderbird, there never would have been an "A-Special" bodied 1969 Grand Prix or the related 1970 Monte Carlo.   


 If it hadn't been for Ford-funded Cosworth developing the modern DFV racing V8, there probably wouldn't have been an Illmor (former Cosworth employees, BTW) "Chevy Indy" V8.


If it hadn't been for Ford-funded Holman & Moody developing the fundamentals of the "modern" NASCAR chassis (while GM sat on its hands), those racing Chevrolets that took advantage of Ford's stupid and disasterous 1971-1981 retirement from competition would have been far different. 


Had Chevrolet not tried to beat Ford's 5.0 Mustang, it is unlikely that anything other than Crossfire-injected 305s would have ever been installed in Gen III or Gen IV (RIP) F-bodies.   


You can hate Ford all day or second-guess a lot of their stupid moves over the past 103 years, but you cannot deny that the "race" the "Ford Boys" have given GM, and more directly, Chevrolet, has shaped most of the "older models" the Chevy Crafters hold dear.  


Now that Ford has plenty of RWD 300-500 h.p. Pony Cars NOW, while GM basically has nada in this critical blue-collar category doesn't really provide any loyal GM fan a sound basis for trash talking about "Ford Boys just wishin [sic] they had a real race car..."

 

 
71_bigblocknova 71_bigblocknova
Guru | Posts: 930 | Joined: 09/04
Posted: 05/18/06
08:38 AM

Anything you can do, I can do better.


That about says it all.

 

 
1 |  2 |  >> 
  • RSS Feed
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Add to Google
    • Subscribe on Bloglines
    • Subscribe on NewsGator
    • MyMSN
    • My AOL
    • Add to NetVibes
    • Add to Rojo
    • Add to NEWSBURST
    • Add to Technorati
    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FORUMS